Btb3
Beyond the Blurb: On Critics and Criticism. Published by Cow Eye Press
Readingscroppedfinal
Critical Essays, Reviews
Critcimcropped
Literature, Literary History, Literary Study

« Incontrovertibly Good | Main | Aeons Old »

11/29/2006

Comments

trent walters

Dan,

Can you please explain what you mean about art that doesn't have practicality or vitamins? I'm not sure what else there is to write about but the world/existence/whatever. What's the difference between art that does not address these things and entertainment?

Dan Green

"what you mean about art that doesn't have practicality or vitamins?"

I don't think I understand your question.

Richard

The term "useful arts" is in the U.S. Constitution. Among the powers of Congress in Article 1, Section 8 is the power to create laws "[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;…"

These are the basis of our copyright and patent laws. Interestingly, "Science" (copyright) referred to books and writing and is parallel with "Authors" and "Writings" while "useful Arts" (patent) is parallel with "Inventors" and "Discoveries."

The framers were smart enough to know that writing is not a useful art.

Trent walters

"I don't think I understand your question."

I'd like to see the parameters of the debate between the vitamin theory of literature vs. the aesthetic. What books do the vitamin people reject that you think worthy? Why do they reject it?

I guess I need to understand what you think defines art as opposed to what the utility people think.

Dan Green

What's the vitamin theory? Where do I reference some such thing in this post?

Trent Walters

Dan,

I'm talking about what you called it. You talked about vitamins. You talked about utility. I have no idea where you would find the theory of utilitarian art. I figured you must have understood what they were about since you were talking about it.

I just wanted to hear where and why they got it wrong--whatever they got wrong. I don't know whether I agree with your points or disagree until I know where both you and they stand. Otherwise, discussing the issue is rather nebulous. I don't know exactly what's addressed, what's at stake when you discussed these last two posts.

Dan Green

Trent:

I think you're confusing this post with the previous one. In this post, I do discuss Dewey's term "useful" arts.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Jp3
The Art of Disturbance--Available as Pdf and Kindle Ebook
Deweylp1
Literary Pragmatism--Available as a Pdf