Beyond the Blurb: On Critics and Criticism. Published by Cow Eye Press




  • A survey of current writers whose work might be called "experimental." Includes a prefatory discussion defining terms, as well as essays on David Foster Wallace, George Saunders, Gary Lutz, Ben Marcus, Mark Danielewski, John Keene, Shelley Jackson, Steve Tomasula, more than a dozen others.
  • Free Pdf
  • Kindle Version


  • "I offer here no overarching theory about the nature or direction of innovative writing by women writers, although as I do note in several of the essays in the first section, there is a recognizable affinity among numerous current writers for what I am here calling 'fabulation.'" Includes essays on Rikki Ducornet, Aimee Bender, Noy Holland, Helen DeWitt, Eimear McBride, more than a dozen others.
  • Free Pdf
  • Kindle/Paperback Version
APF (2)


  • "Although the term has come to identify a general attitude toward traditional intellectual assumptions or, more specifically, discernibly related practices in philosophy, the social sciences, and all of the arts, "postmodern" was originally a critical label attached to an emergent group of American fiction writers perceived to be challenging established literary convention."
  • Free Pdf
  • Kindle/Paperback Version




  • In the early to mid 1960s, an iconoclastic mode of American fiction that came to be called "black humor" presaged the larger movement succeeding it that eventually came to be known as postmodernism. This volume looks at the essential features of black humor fiction, with essays on all the major black humorists: Joseph Heller, Kurt Vonnegut, Bruce Jay Friedman, Terry Southern, and more.
  • Free Pdf
  • Kindle Version


My Post (6)


  • Is a work of experimental fiction really an experiment? What was metafiction? Experimental fiction and tradition. New Romancers. Poetic structures. Fiction as performance. Varieties of experimental fiction.
  • Kindle Ebook
  • Free Pdf


  • Beyond the major publishers’ seasonal lists to out-of-the-way presses and lesser-known writers.
  • Kindle Ebook
  • Free Pdf


  • "In this volume I have included most of my substantial posts on the blog as medium, as well as literary culture online in general. . .They are presented in chronological order, from 2004 to 2019. I have chosen this arrangement because it shows the development of my thinking about online literary criticism and because it may perhaps be interesting for readers to survey the issues that arose as literary blogging itself developed. "
  • Kindle Ebook
  • Free Pdf


  • What do we talk about when we talk about literature? This volume explores that question by, first of all, looking "inside the text" at the dynamics of reading and the tangible effects of writing. It then moves "outside the text" to consider the relevance of social context and culture to perceptions of literature, as well as the assumption it is the writer's job to "say something" of political or moral value in addition to (even as a substitute for) creating literary art.
  • Kindle/Paperback Version
  • Free pdf
My Post (5)




  • Inventing Literature. Performing Literature. Reading Literature. Theorizing Literature. Historicizing Litera- ture. Relinquishing Literature. Reclaiming Literature?
  • Kindle Ebook
  • Free Pdf


  • A collection of essays considering the current state of general-interest book reviewing. Topics include: negative vs. positive reviewing, gatekeeping, writers reviewing writers, and criticism in cyberspace, among others.
  • Free Pdf
  • Kindle Version

« Communication Skills | Main | A Show About Nothing »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


"I don't think this really is a puzzle. These kinds of experimental "fictions" are, in my view, precisely trying to undermine the reflexive association of fiction with story, although perhaps not completely enough that we would want to categorize it as something other than fiction. To this extent, "fiction" becomes simply a literary identifying mark, an acknowledgment of the tradition of prose writing from which it emerges, but no longer very helpfully describes what a work so designated does in terms of storytelling alone. But perhaps at this point as well such a work no longer lends itself very usefully to the kind of analysis a philosopher might want to do of the more ordinary understanding of the term."

Or, simpler, these sorts of experimental pieces are "anti-fiction": that is, they deliberately subvert the traditional structures and restrictions of fiction.

The important point here is that "anti-fiction" only exists in the wake of fiction -- it only has meaning to the extent that it can be counterpointed to traditional fiction. A piece where characters address the reader and debate their eventual fate (I just made that up but I'm sure there's pieces like that out there) only has meaning to the extent that the reader can counterpoint it to more familiar characterizations in other narratives. It's effect depends on our familiarity with other effects.

Compare progressivism in music, for instance.

Adam Kotsko

"Postmodern" philosophy would probably be another example of what doug's talking about.


Thanks very much for the post, Daniel. I have been an avid reader of yours for a couple months and have been meaning on several occasions to respond to one or another interesting post of yours. Don't know why I never got around to it. (Guess I like you stuff so much I wanted to make sure to do it right.)

I'll just make a quick clarification to my 'grandfather-clause' point. I switched too quickly to 'father-clause' to make the analytically dubious 'anxiety of influence' joke about wanting to kill fathers. The more humble point - the only one to which I would want to commit - is that something is going to be fiction if it is lineally descended from something that is clearly fiction. In other words, we take genealogy seriously. I take it this is more or less your point about 'acknowledgement of tradition'. So we are in agreement.

And let me add another quick thought about the philosophy vs. literary criticism opposition you set up. You write:

"Part of the problem with approaching fiction from the vantage point of philosophy is that it excludes certain considerations that would otherwise help to explain what we in fact do enounter in reading fiction or poetry. (Although of course if these considerations were taken into account, the result would be literary criticism and not philosophy."

In part this is too harsh. Philosophers may bury their heads in the sand, refusing too consider factors that would mar their elegant abstractions. But that is considered, in house, to be rather a grave sin (although, like many sins, often committed.) On the other hand, I am not as offended as many other philosophers would be by your hint that if 'philosophy of literature' were done at all decently, it would naturally turn into literary criticism. I think that's probably right, but it needs qualification and a little explanation.

The short, incomplete explanation by analogy: in philosophy of science, no one would try to analyze the essence of 'science' while tabling evaluative considerations of good and bad science; and no one would think you could really do good work without getting a quantity of good science under your fingernails. I think the same is true of philosophy of literature, and that a lot of work either fails, or fails to be as good as it could be, through a failure to acknowledge this squarely. You can't table the evaluative questions, and you have to really get the good stuff under your fingernails. You have to include a substantial element of actual, practical criticism to do good philosophy of literature. Such is my suspicion. But that isn't quite the same as saying that philosophy of literature - if it were actually done right - would cease to be philosophy and become literary criticism. It amounts more to saying that the subject matter is inherently impure, so its successful practitioners will not be philosophical purists.

A version of the same lesson cuts the other way. A lot of literary critics sort of wander into philosophy, while generalizing about their subject matter. And there is nothing wrong with stepping back and generalizing. But these folks make a hash of it due to a failure to take seriously the fact that they are now under some obligation to switch gears and sharpen up their abstractions. This is part and parcel with my long-winded critiques of 'theory'. Not suitable material for the comments box.

Dan Green

John: Thanks for your comment. As I hope my post indicates, I am also an interested reader of your blog.

I honestly didn't mean the statement you quote to sound harsh. Perhaps I shouldn't have used the word "problem." I really only wanted to suggest a difference of emphasis (an appropriate one) between philosophy (even "philosophy of literature") and literary criticism. You're probably right that the boundary can become obscure--although in my view literary critics wandering into philosophy are more likely to make a hash of it than philosophers going the other way--but there is a boundary, I think. Thus most philosophers run the risk of losing sight of particulars and most literary critics don't know how to "sharpen up their abstractions." But it's an occupational hazard.

To identify as fiction writing that is "lineally descended from something that is clearly fiction" seems to me a perfectly satisfactory way of doing the genealogy. But it only makes the analytic account of "fiction" harder to do.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

On Contemporary Fiction